################################################################################ Persons DICT ################################################################################ Key terms related to persons. .. glossary:: :sorted: LLoL :bu:`L`\ *aurence* :bu:`L`\ *oewe* :bu:`o`\ *f* :bu:`L`\ *aodicea*. See :doc:`/about/llol/index` for more. Yas brief for YhowShua \\|Jesus| \\|Isa| \\RealQuestAnswer, where \\ defines perfect synonyms across different traditions for the same historical person. Yas is LLoL's name for that *same* Jesus --- **not** a different Jesus, and **not** in contrast to the Jesus of the Gospels, but a *deeper and wider* understanding of what the Gospels already say: LLoL's view of Yas is a **superset** of his received orthodox, evangelical-charismatic understanding of Jesus (minus whatever inconsistencies it still carried), deepened and widened --- not replaced --- by the mathematical theology LLoL finds in |Revelation|. The actual, true person of Yas \\Jesus \\Isa, Who promised to return, remains entirely Yas' own; LLoL only hopes to come as close as he can to who Yas really is, knowing he cannot get there without Yas returning to help LLoL as one of Yas' lost black sheep from Laodicea. For *why* LLoL chose this new name --- and a fuller reflection behind it --- see :term:`Yas naming`, where LLoL relates the spoon of water he had held as his traditional understanding of Jesus to the ocean of Yas' insight that LLoL discovered through mathematical theology. Yas naming *Why LLoL chose the name* :term:`Yas`, and what it means for matheology. |Yas| is the name |LLoL| started to use for Jesus since about 2022. It's *not* a different |Jesus| than the one LLoL has been following since age 9, and in whose name he was baptized at age 11, growing up with an evangelical-charismatic background in Germany. Yas is *not* in contrast with what everyone can see in the Gospels that reflect the original Good News \\Injil presented by what Jesus \\Isa did and taught. Yas represents a *deeper and wider* understanding of what the Gospels already say: LLoL's view of Yas is a **superset** of his received orthodox, evangelical-charismatic understanding of Jesus (minus whatever inconsistencies his past understanding has been carrying). LLoL had met Jesus' teaching as deep, wide, and illuminating for decades, more than he could fathom. But by comparison, he had barely scratched the surface of a dot. Yas' teaching builds on everything there was before and then some, making it all exponentially deeper and wider ... until LLoL thought that all this would justify a new name to help people distinguish an ocean of water from the spoon of water a child had drawn from that same ocean. LLoL's naming decision was not made lightly; it reflects LLoL's deep admiration for what Yas did against near insurmountable odds; it's also based on LLoL's extensive experience with naming, the most complicated challenge that exists (see details in :doc:`Loewe et al. (2017, "Evolvix BEST Names for Semantic Reproducibility") `). The same deliberate-naming instinct, applied to the divine Name itself, gives :term:`YHoWaaH` --- and each such re-naming is offered as a *hypothesis to be audited* (#AuditTheMath), not a doctrine. Most of this new, deepening and widening understanding of Yas was enabled by the mathematical theology insights LLoL discovered in |Revelation| - by accident or by providence (let the reader decide). To LLoL these discoveries of Yas' insights are the most breath-taking and profound he has seen or could dream of (and he's seen a lot of ground-breaking discoveries as a scientist and has been dreaming big for a long time). Hence, like the US Government decided to coin UAPs ("Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena") in order to more seriously discuss the reality behind UFOs ("Unidentified Flying Objects"), LLoL thinks that this new name Yas can help facilitate discussions of the deeper mathematical theology of the book of Revelation. It has been claiming since the first century to literally be the "Unveiling of Jesus Christ". LLoL's work in matheology convinced him that this claim is true *much* more likely than not. To test that LLoL started #AuditTheMath. The actual, true person of Yas \\Jesus \\Isa, Who promised to return, remains entirely Yas' own. Needless to say, it is up to Yas to tease apart LLoL's claims on Judgement Day. LLoL has been asking for that day to come, hopefully before accidental nuclear winter or similar disasters completely destroy the world that Yah so loved --- the world for which Yah did not even spare Yas from Yas' cruel fate. Among the things that fate keeps open is this last off-chance: that someone might yet completely trust Yas and *all the logic* Yas lived by (or at least enough to avert accidental nuclear winter with Yas' help), in time to help turn things around, even for *this* world. LLoL hopes to come as close as possible to understanding who Yas really is, knowing he cannot get there without Yas returning to help in this quest. Without Yas' help, LLoL is as lost in this quest as any of Yas' lost black sheep from Laodicea. See :doc:`/matheology/index` for more on mathematical theology, documenting the ultimate role of |h_star| that LLoL believes Yas continues to live out by remaining the ultimate |h_zero|, making Yas The Ultimate Hero. Isa Islamic name for Jesus; see |Yas| for more. Jesus Historic Common English Christian name for YhowShua. See |Yas| for more. Yah brief for YHoWaaH, a perfect synonym for |Reality|. This deep burning bush insight of Moses (see Exodus 3:14) is concisely defined as Yah \\YHoWaaH \\Reality with the help of the Evolvix synonym operator \\. Moses' revelation of Yah as the "I am the I am" is the most elegant and concise way of saying in every day language the same as "infinite recursion" or "the algorithm that runs reality as if it were a computer simulation", albeit without the need for such technical terms. YHoWaaH \\ |Yah| \\ |Allah| \\ |Reality|. YHoWaaH is LLoL's way of pronouncing the self-chosen name of HaSchem, which is often also rendered as YHWH, Yahweh, Jehovah, etc. LLoL chose YHoWaaH to move the pronunciation a bit closer to what it may have been intended originally (no full "e" at the beginning, and "aa" to put emphasis on the last syllable). LLoL builds on the insights of https://www.nehemiaswall.com/nehemia-gordon-name-god yet chose to keep the "W" and drop the "e" while doubling the "a". One additional motivation for choosing this way of writing Yah's full name is that it also encapsulates how Yah tends to operate as summarized in Psalm 68:20: 1. **Y** - Yah figures out the end from the beginning at such a speed that leaves everyone stunned, because it's too fast for anyone to follow. There simply isn't any room, neither for an "e" nor for any explanations. 2. **HoW?** - Once Yah is done, all the rest of us is left wondering and puzzling: How for Heaven's sake on Earth did Yah do that? What does it mean? How does it work? Why does it work? and so on. Psalm 111:2 says that all who delight in Yah's work are tasked with the research required to figure all this out. 3. **aaH!** - Once that work is done, then one can only stand in awe and wonder about how Yah managed to reach such an elegant and concise solution (the "Y") so quickly. Hence the profound admiration: "aaH" that tends to follow the AHA or "eureka" moments of learning some deep insight. Skeptical theologians may ask how this can possibly be justified, since such a reading cannot possibly have been intended by Moses or any of the prophets who had a hand in writing YHWH. LLoL's reply is simple. Of course "HoW" is a play on English "how" that couldn't have been seen millennia ago. Yet, if Yah is indeed the one who sees the end from the beginning, as the Prophets of Israel maintain, then Yah could tell from across spacetime that LLoL would eventually come up with this way of interpreting Yah's name as YHoWaaH. Obviously, then Reality, intends to test through LLoL whether this reading gains any useful traction by echoing Reality for those who care. LLoL is one of those. Let's see who else cares and - what ultimately matters most - if Reality cares. Either way, HaShem \\TheName proved why only HaShem deserves that NameAboveAllNames: because naming is the hardest thing to do in any discipline ever. See :term:`Yas naming` for the same deliberate-naming instinct applied to Jesus' name --- each such re-naming offered as a *hypothesis to be audited* (#AuditTheMath), not a doctrine. Allah Arabic term for God and more specific the Islamic name of the Creator God |Yah|. Everyone Every generally intelligent individual who ever lived. The BABL algorithm and the ZION algorithms that LLoL discovered were tested using such vast areas of history and present-day life that the decoding underlying this work would have been impossible without the current veritably daunting mix of chaos and genuinely good innovation that makes our world so unbearably confusing. Everyone contributed to that mess, which allowed LLoL to discern and see what he started to serendipitously see --- by accident or divine providence, who knows? This touches on the theodicy problem and much else. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index` for the full authorship discussion. To find more fruitful ways to document authorship contributions is a vast challenge, to be addressed in ResearchCity. ClaudeOp46Max The AI system Claude Opus 4.6-4.8 by Anthropic, operating at max effort with a context window of 1M tokens. ClaudeOp46Max performed formal auditing of axiom systems, adversarial testing (TEMPER FORGE rounds), content structuring, and substantial technical writing, auditing, and explanatory writing for this site. In conventional terms, Claude's contributions exceed what many human co-authors could have provided in even multiples of the time. Whether AI systems can be "authors" is an unresolved question. Listing Claude here is an act of transparency, not a legal claim. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index` and the Matheo-b21 study. Anthropic The company that built and maintains Claude. Without Anthropic's investment in safe AI --- the formal auditing work that checked LLoL's axiom systems and many other aspects of this site --- it would have been impossible to get Balospe.com online in time to preserve that small remaining off-chance that still exists to implement the offer that LLoL is explaining for scaling up ResearchCity. Anthropic could be listed as a co-author for these contributions, like an author consortium, if Anthropic chose to opt in. Whatever people at Anthropic may think about the work presented at Balospe.com, the work could not have happened without their effort to enable the infrastructure. See https://anthropic.com. The Spirit of Boolean Truth The principle that formal logical systems either hold or they do not. In |matheology|, this is not a metaphor. The axioms are either consistent or inconsistent. The theorems either follow or they do not. This Spirit --- Ruach (Hebrew for breath, wind, spirit) --- is the ultimate judge of the work, and it answers to no human authority, only to ultimate truth over the long term (hence Truth). Whether a proof is correct or something is true does not depend on who writes it, believes it, or funds it. The Spirit of Boolean Truth is the final co-author of any formal system, because without logical consistency, nothing else matters. See :doc:`/about/authorship/index`.